Best Practice for Schema Design in Oracle Database — My Perspective
- Balaaji Dhananjayan
- Oct 9
- 1 min read
In my experience, one of the most effective and maintainable schema designs in Oracle is to separate ownership and usage through a two-schema model:
OWNER Schema – This schema owns all the database objects such as tables, procedures, packages, views, indexes, etc.
USER Schema – This schema contains only synonyms that point to the objects in the OWNER schema.
Why this design works best:
Separation of Responsibilities
The OWNER schema is strictly for DDL operations (object creation, modification, grants) and not even Application service account is exposed directly.
The USER schema is purely for DML operations (application reads/writes).
This keeps structure and data access cleanly separated.
Simplified CI/CD Integration
Your CI/CD pipelines connect only to the OWNER schema for controlled DDL deployments programatically.
This ensures database changes are versioned, traceable, and isolated from runtime traffic.
The application service account connects to the USER schema, executing only DMLs through synonyms.
Improved Security & Governance
The application user never touches actual base tables directly — only through granted synonyms.
Grants are easier to manage, and privilege escalation risks are minimised.
Clean Audit Trails
You can clearly distinguish between structural and data change activities in audit logs — vital for compliance and debugging.
This design strikes the right balance between control, security, and maintainability — especially in large enterprise environments with frequent releases and multiple integration layers.
I’ve seen this pattern scale effectively across environments where automation, DevOps, and governance all intersect.
Would love to hear how others are structuring their schemas — do you follow a similar model or something different?
Comments